IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
----ooOoo----
DelAnne V. Jessop, ) MEMORANDUM DECISION
) (Not For Official Publication)
Petitioner, )
) Case No. 20080722-CA
v. )
) F I L E D
Department of Workforce ) (November 28, 2008)
Services and Midvale City )
Corporation, ) 2008 UT App 428
)
Respondent. )
Original Proceeding in this Court
Attorneys:
DelAnne V. Jessop, West Jordan, Petitioner Pro Se
Suzan Pixton, Salt Lake City, for Respondent
Before Judges Bench, Davis, and McHugh.
PER CURIAM:
DelAnne V. Jessop petitions for judicial review of the final
decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (the Board). This case
is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition
based upon lack of jurisdiction due to the failure to file a
timely petition for review of the Board's decision. See Utah R.
App. P. 14(a).
A petition for review of an agency's final order must be
filed "within 30 days after the date of the written decision or
order." Id.; see also Utah Code Ann. § 63-46b-14(3)(a) (2004)
("A party shall file a petition for judicial review of final
agency action within 30 days."). If the petition is not timely
filed, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the petition and
must dismiss it. See Silva v. Dep't. of Employment Sec., 786
P.2d 246, 247 (Utah Ct. App. 1990) (per curiam).
The Board issued its final order on July 22, 2008. Jessop
did not file her petition for review until August 25, 2008,
thirty-four days after issuance of the Board's decision, and four
days beyond the time limitation set forth in rule 14(a). See
Utah R. App. P. 14(a). Because Jessop did not timely file a
petition for review, we lack jurisdiction to consider the merits
of the petition. When we lack jurisdiction, we retain "only the
authority to dismiss the action." Varian-Eimac, Inc. v.
Lamoreaux, 767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct. App. 1989).
Therefore, the petition for review is dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
Russell W. Bench, Judge
James Z. Davis, Judge
Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge
20080722-CA 2