IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
----ooOoo---
Lisa G. Hutchison, ) MEMORANDUM DECISION
) (Not For Official Publication)
Petitioner, )
) Case No. 20080833-CA
v. )
) F I L E D
Department of Workforce ) (December 4, 2008)
Services, Workforce Appeals )
Board, ) 2008 UT App 438
)
Respondent. )
Original Proceeding in this Court
Attorneys:
Lisa G. Hutchison, St. George, Petitioner Pro Se
Susan Pixton, Salt Lake City, for Respondent
Before Judges Bench, Davis, and McHugh.
PER CURIAM:
Lisa G. Hutchison petitions for judicial review of the final
decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (the Board). This case
is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition
based upon lack of jurisdiction due to the failure to file a
timely petition for review of the Board's decision. See Utah R.
App. P. 14(a).
A petition for review of an agency's final order must be
filed "within 30 days after the date of the written decision or
order." Id.; see also Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-401(3)(a) (Supp.
2008) ("A party shall file a petition for judicial review of
final agency action within 30 days."). If the petition is not
timely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the
petition and must dismiss it. See Silva v. Department of
Employment Sec., 786 P.2d 246, 247 (Utah Ct. App. 1990) (per
curiam).
The Board issued its final order on August 21, 2008.
Hutchison did not file her petition for review until October 6,
2008, forty-six days after the issuance of the decision by the
Board, and well beyond the time limitation set forth in rule
14(a). See Utah R. App. P. 14(a). Because Hutchison did not
timely file a petition for review, we lack jurisdiction to
consider the merits of the petition. When we lack jurisdiction,
we retain "only the authority to dismiss the action." Varian-
Eimac, Inc. v. Lamoreaux, 767 P.2d 569, 570 (Utah Ct. App. 1989).
Therefore, the petition for review is dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction.
Russell W. Bench, Judge
James Z. Davis, Judge
Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge
20080833-CA 2