APPEAL FROM ORDER OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY, HON. GAIL W. HARRIS, TRIAL JUDGE, GRANTING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST A CORPORATE DEFENDANT AND ITS PRESIDENT BUT DENYING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST THE PRESIDENT INDIVIDUALLY TO PROHIBIT HIM FROM FORMING NEW CORPORATIONS OR WORKING IN A CAPACITY IN ANOTHER CORPORATION WHERE HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FILING REQUIRED REPORTS AND PAYING UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES. WHILE AN INDIVIDUAL AND A CORPORATION ARE TWO DISTINCT ENTITIES, HULRNE V. SPRINGFIELD LIFE INSURANCE CO., 565 P D 666 (OKLA. 1977), OKLAHOMA COURTS WILL DISREGARD THE CORPORATE ENTITY WHERE FRAUD, ILLEGAL OR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT IS THE RESULT OF THE USE OF SEPARATE CORPORATE STRUCTURES. LUCKETT V. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., 618 F D 1373 (10TH CIR. 1980); SELECTED INSURANCE CORP. V. DUNCAN, 260 F D 918 (10TH CIR. 1958), CERT. DENIED 359 U.S. 914 (1959).
AT TRIAL, DEFENDANTS MADE CERTAIN FACTUAL STIPULATIONS AND THE PARTIES AGREED TO SUBMIT THE MATTER BY BRIEFS AND APPENDED EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS, AND DEFENDANTS ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ALL THE EVIDENCE WAS BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT. PLAINTIFF PRESENTED TOTALLY UNREBUTTED EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS NOT THE CORPORATIONS BUT MORROW, HIDING BEHIND THE VARIOUS BUSINESS ENTITIES, WHO FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ACT PURSUANT TO