IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 
FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2001 
CLAUDIA FRYBURG, 
Appellant, 
v. 
Case No. 5D01-32 
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 
Appellee. 
/ 
Opinion filed September 14, 2001 
Administrative Appeal from the 
Unemployment Appeals Commission. 
Claudia E. Fryburg, Ormond Beach, Pro Se. 
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 
ORFINGER, R. B., J. 

Claudia Fryburg appeals a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission 
affirming the appeals referee’s ruling that she is not entitled to unemployment compensation 
benefits. We affirm. Fryburg has the burden to demonstrate error. Wolfson v. Unemployment 
Appeals Comm’n, 649 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Because the focus of Fryburg’s 
argument is the fact findings made by the referee, Fryburg’s failure to include a copy of the 
transcript of the hearing as part of the record on appeal is fatal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank 
of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). The referee found that Fryburg left her 
employment in order to assist her seriously ill sister and not for any cause attributable to the 
employer. “The question of whether a claimant left work voluntarily is a question of fact.”
Ritenour v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 570 So. 2d 1106, 1107 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). 
That fact was decided adversely to Fryburg and, in the absence of a transcript, we presume 
it to be correct. 

AFFIRMED. 
PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.