IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 
FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002 
DAVE M. McGILL, 
Appellant, 
v. CASE NO. 5D01-1325 
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS 
COMMISSION, 
Appellee. 
______________________________/ 
Opinion filed June 14, 2002 
Administrative Appeal from the 
Unemployment Appeals Commission. 
David M. McGill, DeBary, pro se. 
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 
SHARP, W., J.
 
McGill appeals from a final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which affirmed the 
decision of the appeals referee. The referee determined that McGill was not entitled to unemployment 
compensation benefits because his conduct as an employee rose to the level of willful disregard of his duties 
and obligations owed his employer, as defined by section 443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm. 

This is another case that is essentially unreviewable at the District Court of Appeal level because 
there is no transcript of the hearing before the appeals referee. In this situation, McGill cannot establish
error.1 Nor is there any basis in this case to shift the responsibility for the absence of a transcript to 
appellee. Without a transcript, in a case like this which hinges on the resolution of disputed factual matters, 
the appellant's case cannot but fail. 

AFFIRMED. 
PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B. JJ., concur.