IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA 
NIMALI SONDEL, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. 
v. CASE NO.: 1D02-0257 
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT 
APPEALS COMMISSION, 
Appellee. 
________________________/ 
Opinion filed June 2, 2003. 
An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission. 
Nimali Sondel, pro se. 

John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Unemployment Appeals Commission, 
Tallahassee, for Appellee. 
PER CURIAM. 

Nimali Sondel, the appellant, seeks reversal of an order of the Unemployment 
Appeals Commission which sustained the decision of the appeals referee and thus 
affirmed the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. Appellant has failed to 
include a transcript of the hearing before the appeals referee and therefore is unable to
show that the findings of the referee are not supported by competent and substantial 
evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1980). 

Also, appellant has not identified a misapplication of law. Accordingly, the order 
under review is AFFIRMED. 

AFFIRMED. 
VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS AND HAWKES, JJ., CONCUR.